Wednesday 19 June 2024 10:30 PM
Nafeza 2 world - Ms Janneh brought civil action against Mr Lousada, where cases are ruled upon on "the balance of probabilities", as opposed to criminal prosecutions, which require a higher standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt".
This meant she needed to prove that it was more likely than not that she did not give consent to the sexual activity, rather than prove that Mr Lousada did not reasonably believe that she did not consent.
Her legal action was for damages over claims of assault, trespass to the person, and negligence against Mr Lousada and Anteros Books Ltd, a company he directed.
Barristers for Mr Lousada, who now lives in Germany, said he had previously engaged in penile penetration with about "30 to 40" clients.
Following the High Court's ruling, a spokesperson for the CPS said: "In criminal cases we must prove beyond reasonable doubt that an individual is guilty.
"Following a careful review of the evidence in this case, we concluded there was not a realistic prospect of conviction – a decision later supported by two independent reviews."
The Met Police said it was aware of the outcome of the civil case and would assess any new information that was presented in the process.
It also confirmed there is currently no active police investigation in the case.
Cdr Kevin Southworth, who leads on public protection, said: "We strive to deliver the best service we can and take allegations of rape and sexual assault seriously, so it’s concerning whenever we hear that someone feels let down.
"We have not received any complaints about this investigation but would welcome the chance to discuss this further so we can understand and address any concerns."
